INSTITUTE FOR BIRD POPULATIONS / NBII BIRD CONSERVATION NODE
SURVIVORSHIP ESTIMATES

Note: This website is best viewed with Internet Explorer Version 5.0 and later, Netscape Navigator Version 6.0 and later, or Mozilla Firefox.

This form provides a web-based query interface to regional time-constant estimates of annual adult apparent survival probability1, recapture probability2, and proportion of residents among those newly-banded adults that were not recaptured seven or more days later during their first year of capture3 from modified Cormack-Jolly-Seber mark-recapture analyses4 (using transient models5); amount of support6 for temporal (annual) variation in survival probability, recapture probability, and proportion of residents among those newly-banded adults that were not recaptured seven or more days later during their first year of capture, obtained from time-dependent models6; and the time-dependent models selected7 from twelve years (1992-2003) of MAPS data for 179 species8 of North American landbirds.

 
Please select a demographic parameter, species, and region below*:
Survival probability1      Recapture probability2 and Proportion of residents3
Select a Region9:
Select a Species8:
*NOTE: You may view data for a single species across all regions, or all species within a single region, but this interface can not display survival rate estimates for all species in all regions at once.

1  Defined as the probability of an adult bird surviving to and returning in a particular year (breeding season) to the area where it was present in the previous year (breeding season).
2  Defined as the conditional probability of recapturing an adult bird at least once in a particular year (breeding season), given that it did survive and return to the area where it was present in the previous year (breeding season).
3  The estimated proportion of residents among those newly-banded adults that were not recaptured seven or more days later during their first year of capture.
4  Using the computer program TMSURVIV (Hines, J.E., W.L. Kendall, and J.D. Nichols. 2003. On the use of the robust design with transient capture-recapture models. Auk 120:1151-1158), a modification of SURVIV (White, G.C. 1983. Numerical estimation of survival rates from band recovery and biotelemetry data. Jr. Wildlife Management 47:716-728) to accommodate transient models.
5  These models, developed by Pradel et al., 1997 (Pradel, R., J. Hines, J.-D. Lebreton, and J.D. Nichols. 1997. Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60-72), modified in Nott and DeSante 2002 (Nott, M.P., and D.F. DeSante. 2002. Demographic monitoring and the identification of transients in mark-recapture models. In Scott, J.M., P.J. Heglund, M.L. Morrison, et. al. (eds.), Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy. Island Press, New York), and fully formulated in Hines et al. 2003 (see above) include both between- and within-year information on transients and permit the estimation of three parameters: survival probability (Φ), recapture probability (p), and proportion of transients among those newly-banded adults that were not recaptured seven or more days later during their first year of capture (τ). In the fully time-constant model, each of these three parameters is constrained to be constant over all years.
6  The amount of statistical support for time-dependence in survival probability (Φt), recapture probability (pt), or proportion of residents among those newly-banded adults that were not recaptured seven or more days later during their first year of capture (τt) is determined by summing the QAICC weights (wi; Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York) for all models in which each of those parameters is allowed to vary with time (annually). Despite support for time-dependence in these parameters for some species in some regions, all parameter estimates presented are from the fully time-constant model.
7  Selected models are those for which Akaike's Information Criterion (QAICC), modified for small sample sizes and overdispersion of data, is within 2.0 QAICC units of the lowest QAICC.
8  Species included are those for which (a) an average of at least 2.5 individual adult birds were captured per year from all stations pooled over the twelve years 1992-2003 (30 year-unique records); (b) at least two returns were recorded during the twelve years from all stations pooled; and (c) survival and recapture probabilities were neither 1.000 nor 0.000. Data for any given species were only included from stations where the species was a regular or usual summer resident and breeder (i.e., attempted to breed during all or more than half of the years, respectively, that the station was operated).
9  Region codes identify the MAPS Region in which the station is located. Data from stations in the Alaska Region (AK) and the Boreal & Arctic Canada Region (B&AC) were pooled into a single super-region, Alaska and Boreal & Arctic Canada Regions (AK/B&AC) for survivorship analyses. The region codes are: AK/B&AC = Alaska and Boreal & Arctic Canada Regions, NW = Northwest Region, SW = Southwest Region, NC = North-central Region, SC = South-central Region, NE = Northeast Region, SE = Southeast Region. See the NBII MAPS Home Page for a map of the MAPS Regions.

If you encounter technical difficulties, please contact the site developer or the site coordinator.
NBII MAPS Web-Based Query Interface
NBII Home
IBP Home
NBII MAPS Home Page
MAPS Adult Populations and Productivity Data
MAPS Survivorship Data
MAPS Station Information
MAPS Habitat Information
MAPS Breeding Status Data
IBP Membership Page
NBII/MAPS Information Page